Comments and Reviews

Monday Apr 20, 2009

Is the Washington Consensus Dead?

The recent G20 meeting in London elevated the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to a new level. Its lending capacity was tripled to US$750 billion. In the aftermath of World War II, the IMF was established to deal with declining commodity prices and deteriorating international trade. During the oil price shocks of the 1970s the IMF became lender of last resort, mainly to countries with balance of payments problems. The debt crisis of the early 1980s in Latin America gave the Fund further impetus. By the mid 1980s the IMF and the World Bank had become policy architects in low-income countries. The 1998 Asian financial crisis brought the IMF to the forefront of crisis management. In 2009, we are again at another milestone—the Fund is back with even greater influence. Read the publication at: http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCOnePager82.pdf 

 

Comments:

This note revisits the debate on the Washington Consensus. It is true that any lending agency requires prudential norms to avoid adverse slection and moral hazard problems. But IMF is a multilateral instituion to promote a global public good namely economic stability.As the stage of economic development and baseline economic conditions vary from country to country,and the need to take into account the priorities,policy spaces and implementation difficulties of developing countries, the conditionalities must be county -specific, focussing on oucome monitoring than on input monitoring.

Posted by 172.16.0.98 on April 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM BRT #

What's wrong about eleminating fuel subsidies and electricity cost recovery? Hence, some nuances as to buzz word "W.C." might strengthen the argument.

Posted by 172.16.0.98 on April 22, 2009 at 04:31 PM BRT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed

Calendar


Comment on all
IPC Publications

Search

Links